AIAA Position Papers provide objective and balanced studies with a clear AIAA position on the best course of action by government to address issues of interest or concern to AIAA members.
Any AIAA member may initiate AIAA Policy Papers including representatives from AIAA Sections, Technical and/or Program Committees, and the Public Policy Committee.
Click here for a copy of those guidelines. Please contact Steve Howell at firstname.lastname@example.org for more information.
Infrastructure Recommendations for Implementation of Executive Order 13419
11 January 2008
Aeronautics Science & Technology Subcommittee (ASTS) of the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) is currently working to implement the provisions of Executive Order 13419, and of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (PL109-155), that require the federal government to establish a new National Aeronautics Research and Development Plan. Included in the plan is a coordinated approach to managing U.S. Government aeronautics research, development, and test and evaluation infrastructure identified as critical national assets required to maintain and advance world-class U.S. experimental and computational R&D capabilities.
Civil Aeronautics Research and Technology – January 2007
It is the position of AIAA that stable, robust, long-term Federal civil aeronautics research and technology initiatives—funded at a level that will assure U.S. leadership in aeronautics—are critical to sustain a strong national economy, maintain a skilled workforce, and effectively support national security.
The Versatile Affordable Advanced Turbine Engines (VAATE) Initiative – January 2006
The aircraft gas turbine engine has played a preeminent role in establishing and maintaining the air dominance that U.S. military forces have enjoyed for many years. Future warfighter requirements continue to drive us to more capable, durable, and cost-effective aircraft systems. Although these systems can be achieved only through even greater advancement in jet propulsion capability, U.S. DOD investment in turbine engine research has been drastically reduced over the last few years. Unless this trend is reversed, we will be unable to meet the requirements of the military’s new transformational environment.
Protecting Earth from Asteroids and Comets – October 2004
It is clear that the world community is only in the very early stages of developing deflectiontechnologies. Much work must be done before a deflection mission can be fielded with any confidence that it would actually be successful in reducing the likelihood of impact. The success of a deflection mission will depend on public funding and support and, as a result, increasing public awareness of the NEO threat is important. Providing credible information on past impacts, on observed and predicted close approaches, and on mitigation activities will increase public awareness that impacts do happen and that the possibility of future impacts is not being ignored.
Assuring Effective International Space Station Utilization – 9 August 2001
While the cost of completing ISS development and of operating the ISS must be limited to an acceptable level, an effort must also be made to get an adequate return on that investment by assuring its effective utilization for scientific research.
Seeking the Proper Balance Between Simulation and Flight Test – 1 October 1999
This paper examines the past and present roles of modeling and simulation (M&S) in lieu of, or in support of, the developmental engineering flight testing of aircraft and airborne systems. However, it should be noted that much of the commentary also applies to space systems. It posits that both M&S and flight testing are essential for efficient and effective development of such systems. It demonstrates, however, that the proper balance of the two must be based on sound engineering and programmatic analysis of their respective capabilities, benefits and disadvantages. At this time such a rigorous evaluation is rare, contributing to demonstrated or potential testing mishaps, poor development methodology, cost and schedule impacts, and deficient systems.