Dates to Remember

Abstract Submission Begins
4 September 2019

Abstract Deadline 
8 October 2019, 2000 hrs Eastern Time Zone, USA

Author Notifications Sent
22 November 2019

Final Presentation Deadline
14 April 2020, 2000 hrs Eastern Time Zone, USA

The AIAA DEFENSE Forum will provide a foundation for continued discussions, technical information exchange, and networking on hot topics within the defense and security industries. Sessions will be held on topics such as cyberspace, hypersonic systems, innovative concepts and emerging technologies, missile defense, robotic and unmanned weapon systems, space defense, strategic and tactical missile systems, targets and countermeasures, weapon systems performance, analysis, modeling and simulation, testing and evaluation. To enable effective discussions and briefings, material presented and discussed during this forum is encouraged to be at the Secret/NOFORN clearance level. All attendees and presenters must have a final SECRET clearance or higher in order to participate. 

Abstracts for this forum must be UNCLASSIFIED and cleared for public release with unlimited distribution. All authors must first receive publication approval from their companies and/or sponsoring agencies before submitting their abstracts. If it is not possible to get the necessary approval before the abstract deadline, please submit a file (download template) that includes your name and contact info and someone from the committee will contact you.

 

 

Advanced Prototypes

Please direct questions to: 
Ryan Fontaine, MIT Lincoln Laboratory 

Innovative engineering solutions are necessary to field advanced systems that provide the DoD with new and improved capabilities in both modern and future mission spaces. Novel approaches to thermal management, structural and aerodynamic design, power and control devices, optics, manufacturing processes, and other related areas can help make conceptual systems a reality. Briefings are solicited for a session highlighting hardware; the engineering, manufacturing, and assembly challenges associated with building and fielding advanced prototypes in areas of interest to the DoD. 

  • Engineering Trades Required to Produce a Fieldable System 
  • Hardware Design, Build, and Test Challenges and Successes
  • Implementation of Novel Technology and Hardware to Enable New DoD Capabilities
  • Innovative Manufacturing Processes 
  • Low-Size, Weight, and Power (SWaP) Multifunctional Components 
Autonomy and Machine Intelligence

Please direct questions to:
W. Tod Newman, Raytheon
Robie Samanta Roy, Lockheed Martin

In 2016 The Defense Science Board conducted a study at the request of the Undersecretary of Defense for AT&L that concluded "that there are both substantial operational benefits and potential perils associated with the use of autonomy" in Defense systems. The DSB also articulated that the rapid advance of enabling technologies and commercial applications was providing significant opportunities for the DoD. This study concluded that "DoD must accelerate its exploitation of autonomy--both to realize the potential military value and to remain ahead of adversaries who also will exploit its operational benefits."

In 2019, the DoD released its Artificial Intelligence (AI) Strategy following national AI initiatives highlighted by a Presidential Executive Order. The centerpiece of DoD’s Strategy was the creation of the Joint AI Center (JAIC), with focus on the applications and infrastructure of ML to DoD problems. Today we find that the maturation of Autonomy and Machine Intelligence technology has yet to reach critical mass for use in many franchise DoD programs. In this track, we explore the challenges associated with Autonomy and Machine Intelligence, especially focusing on maturation and deployment of technologies and techniques that will help engender trust in systems leveraging stochastic, non-deterministic autonomous capabilities.

  • Autonomous Systems and the T&E and Safety Communities - Processes and Procedures for Certification
  • Autonomous Systems on the Multi-Domain Battlefield - Time to Relook at DoDI 3000.09?
  • Autonomy/Machine Intelligence Solutions to Intractable Hypersonics Challenges
  • "Explainable" AI - Towards Understanding the “Black Box” Nature of Deep Neural Networks
  • Fragility in Today's ML Techniques; What Does "Algorithmic Warfare" in the Future Look Like?
  • Large-Scale Data and SW Dev Frameworks for ML - Applications of Commercial Best Practices to DoD?
  • Sparse Data Machine Learning - DoD Challenge Problems That Silicon Valley Isn’t Addressing
Computing Systems

Please direct question to: 
Rick Tuggle, PeopleTec

Papers sought on theoretical and practical use of software, hardware, computer, and infromation systems at both a technical and policy level of aerospace and defense appliations, focusing on aerospace computing; cybersecurity to include information assurance, program protection, & risk management; parallel, GPU, multicore and high-performance computing; embedded and autonomous systems; and survivable computing in extreme environments.

  • Current state of Aerospace and Defense Computing System Programs and Projects
  • Cybersecurity and DoD Risk Management Framework (RMF)
  • High Performance and Embedded Computing for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  • Parallel, GPU, Multicore, and High-Performance Computing
  • Quantum Computing
  • Reconfigurable Computing
  • Survivable Computing in Extreme Environments (Such As Space and High Velocity/Acceleration)
Directed Energy Weapons

Please direct questions to: 
Mark Neice, Directed Energy Professional Society
Gary Wood, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

Directed Energy Weapons are emerging for Defense applications. This session will look at DE capabilities that can be implemented in an airborne environment, for both defensive and offensive operations. Presentations are solicited for laser DEW, RF and microwave DEW and any other form of airborne DEWs. In addition to the weapon source technology, other technologies as they relate to airborne DE are important such as: primer power, thermal management, beam control, beam propagation, command and control, sensors, and lethality. Of particular interest are DEW systems, how DEWs fit within a system of systems concept and how DEW's affect operational scenarios. The Committee is seeking briefings on the use of DEW's that address the capabilities listed below.

  • Coordination of Conventional Weapons with DEWs
  • Counter to Swarming Attacks
  • Counter-RAM
  • Counter-Sensors/ISR
  • Counter-UAVs
  • Means to Extend the Range of DEWs
  • Minimizing the Environmental Impacts on DEW Effectiveness
  • Other Topics in Directed Energy Weapons
Guidance, Navigation, Control, and Estimation

Please direct questions to: 
Mike McFarland, Raytheon 

Current and future defense systems rely more than ever on advanced guidance, navigation, control, and estimation to achieve precision, reliability and autonomy in challenging adversarial environments. Unmanned platforms, missiles, spacecraft, and even manned vehicles, ground support systems, and data networks are achieving unprecedented levels of performance and robustness by leveraging breakthroughs in components, machine learning, computer vision, cooperative/distributed algorithms, autonomous navigation, optimal guidance, feedback control, sensor fusion, and other technical areas. Presentations describing such advances in algorithms, software, and hardware are solicited, as are presentations on novel applications, improvements to existing systems, field test results, and lessons learned.

Hypersonic Systems and Technologies

Please direct questions to: 
Anjaney Kottapalli, Lockheed Martin Corporation 
James McIntire, MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Presentations are solicited for a session addressing hypersonic and high speed flight systems and technologies. This call is intended to include systems that utilize a significant phase of hypersonic flight within the atmosphere including hypersonic ISR vehicles, hypersonic cruise missiles, gun-launched hypervelocity projectiles and hypersonic boost-glide vehicles. There is interest in concepts using sustained air-breathing propulsion, rocket-boosted vehicles with significant unpowered glide capabilities, and innovative hybrid propulsion systems. There is particular interest in key enabling air vehicle technologies as well as end-to-end system concepts that bring revolutionary military capabilities to the warfighter and the enabling technologies necessary for mission success with high speed systems.

  • Advanced Flight Control and Trajectory Optimization
  • Aerothermal Modeling and Phenomenology of Hypersonic Flowfields
  • Ground Testing and Flight Testing of Hypersonic Systems
  • High Temperature Materials and Affordable Manufacturing
  • Hypersonic Flight Vehicle Design and System Concept Studies
  • Hypersonic Propulsion
  • Innovative Techniques for Defending Against Adversary Hypersonic System Capabilities
  • Seeker and Targeting Technologies for High-Speed Strike Weapons
  • Subsystem Development for Hypersonic Vehicles
Missile Defense

Please direct questions to: 
Rick Gamble, Arnold Engineering Development Complex\QuantiTech
David Fox, Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control

Missile Defense requirements continue to broaden as new threats emerge on land, sea, air and space. This Forum topic seeks technical briefings on existing, newly-deployed, and emerging concepts for missile defense. Effective Missile Defense assimilates a wide range of capabilities across the missile defense timeline and system, and, as such, briefings are requested on threat detection and characterization, missile defense subsystems such as interceptors or command/control, and integrated missile defense systems to defeat multiple threat types. Other innovative topics not included in the sub-topic list will also be considered.

  • Ballistic Defense Concepts and Systems
  • Hypersonic Defense Concepts and Systems
  • Missile Defense in Other Battlefield Domains
  • Space Development Agency Collaboration
  • Threat Characterization
  • Other Topics in Missile Defense
Modeling and Simulation of Warhead Effects

Please direct questions to: 
Otmar (Nick) Yakaboski, U.S. Air Force AFLCMC

The committee seeks briefings concerning current progress on technology development, design maturity and testing that has occurred on rapidly moving programs across the defense community on hypersonic weapon systems. How are numerous programs sharing the spectrum and are we leveraging our capabilities across the defense industry in a cost effective manner?

  • Aerodynamic Design
  • Aerothermal Modeling
  • Flight Testing
  • Ground Testing - Wind Tunnels
  • Novel Applications
  • Payload Integration
  • Propulsion Design
Robotic and Unmanned Weapon Systems

Please direct questions to: 
Zach Hall, U.S. Army CCDC AvMC
Mike McFarland, Raytheon

With the maturing and miniaturization of applicable technologies, autonomous and unmanned systems have new capabilities increasing their popularity within the U.S. military. Robotic, unmanned systems offer affordable, capable fighting machines with less risk to their operators. Applications for these systems include C3, ISR, weapons systems platforms, and ground/air safety. Autonomy enables robot capability to execute tedious and hazardous tasks not specifically planned or designed. Autonomous robots can be tasked when factors are unknown, or when the geological environment cannot be anticipated. Policies and technologies are needed to bind unmanned systems’ operational space; tools and testing are needed to characterize performance limits of capability/robot competence.

  • Autonomy
  • Counter UAS
  • Miniaturization
  • Urban Warfare
Space Systems

Please direct questions to: 
Michael McFarland, Raytheon

Space Systems are in the defense news daily, spanning topics from acquisition to user services to resiliency and survivability. Space systems are the basis for U.S. assured access to space, consisting of launch vehicles, spacecraft, payloads, ground support equipment, launch operations and ranges and test hardware used in ground testing and operations. Space systems also include operations centers to maintain space vehicles or spacecraft on orbit. With current defense reliance on non-U.S. space systems, and the failures of certified space systems, assured access to space is a growing concern. The size and type of space systems is changing, and the defense community is increasingly leveraging commercial capabilities. Space Systems require rigorous developmental test and evaluation due to the harsh launch, landing and operational space environment, and must function from the first time to every time called upon. Emphasis is on rapid and effective fielding of space assets and compressed space acquisition cycles. Submissions are solicited that address any of these aspects of state-of-the-art military space systems.

Strategic Missile Systems – Ground- and Sea-Based Deterrent Systems

Please direct questions to: 
Mark Olmos, Northrop Grumman (Ground Based Missile Systems) 
Alexander Edsall, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. (Sea Based Missile Systems)  

Presentations are solicited for sessions addressing Ground-Based and Sea-Based Deterrent Strategic Missile Systems, focusing on future requirements, development of new technical and operational concepts, modernization and sustainment of existing weapon systems, lowering life cycle costs, and application of innovative engineering and manufacturing processes. Challenges include lowering future cost of ownership, mitigating technology obsolescence and industrial base evolution, providing flexibility, diversity, responsiveness, accuracy, and survivability for long-term effectiveness, and assuring safety, security and reliability. Technical presentations are solicited for engineering, science and technology developments applicable to fire control and launch systems, missiles, and reentry vehicles.

  • Advanced Concepts, Including Penetration Aids, Underwater Launch, & Radiation Hardening
  • Advanced Technology for Thermal Protection, Propulsion, Avionics, Sensors & Materials/Structures
  • Aging Effects, Surveillance, & Age Management
  • Concepts to Leverage Technologies, Design Approaches, & Infrastructure Across Weapon Systems
  • Design & Operational Concepts for Future Strategic Weapon Systems
  • Ground Test, Flight Test, & Alternative Test Methods
  • Modeling & Simulation Techniques for Strategic Missiles & Subsystems
  • Other Component Technologies for Meeting Unique Strategic Requirements
  • System Enablers for Affordability for Strategic Missiles
  • Test & Evaluation for Strategic Missiles, Booster, Reentry & Subsystems
  • Weather Effects on Reentry Vehicle Performance
Survivability

Please direct questions to: 
Steven Broussard, Boeing  
William Schonberg, Missouri University of Science & Technology

The Survivability Technical Committee (SURTC) promotes the research and development of new technologies that define the state-of-the-art in survivability. Survivability is the capability of a system to avoid or withstand a hostile environment (man-made or otherwise). Therefore, the survivability discipline forms part of the systems engineering process and is affected by all other engineering disciplines, such as materials (e.g., armor applications), and structures (e.g., resilient structures). The SURTC is looking to the future as game changers emerge and revolutionize the discipline, and, in addition to the topics listed below, is particularly interested in advanced materials and structures for survivability.

  • Additive Manufacturing and Survivability (e.g., Improved/Faster Battle-Damage Repairs)
  • Aerospace Survivability and the Cyberspace/Information Domain
  • Armor/Anti-Armor
  • Autonomy and Survivability (e.g. Survivability of Autonomous Agents, Adaptive Survivability)
  • General Survivability
  • Survivability Against Directed Energy Weapons
  • Survivability Game Changers: Emerging Technological Solutions That Will Revolutionize Survivability
  • System Safety, Protection, and Health Monitoring
System and Decision Analysis for National Security

Please direct questions to: 
Bradley Steinfeldt, Sandia National Laboratories
Jarret Lafleur, Sandia National Laboratories
Keith Labbe, Strategic Planning and Analysis, Inc.

National security decision-makers often turn to system-level decision analyses to help them evaluate the differences in cost, risk, and benefit of alternative future options. These analyses usually include some of the following elements: definition of objectives, criteria, and metrics; brainstorming, definition, and enumeration of alternative systems or approaches; modeling and evaluation of alternatives against criteria; and conversion of multi criteria analyses into overall alternative evaluations and recommendations. This topic area seeks to bring together professionals from throughout the defense industry to share methods, lessons learned, and insights in system-level decision analysis gained during national security work. Possible topics include but are not limited to:                  

  • Conceptual Design and Evaluation 
  • Data Visualization and Communication 
  • Economic and Resource Analysis 
  • Methods and Tools for Decision Analysis 
  • Performance and Capability Analysis 
  • Policy Trade Studies
  • Risk Analysis
  • Other Topics in System and Decision Analysis for National Security
Tactical Missiles

Please direct questions to: 
Mark Friedlander, Aerojet Rocketdyne

Presentations are solicited on advances in the research, development, test, and evaluation of Joint, Army, Navy, and Air Force tactical missiles. Papers may address components or systems. Papers are solicited for sessions on tactical surface-to-surface, air-to-air, and air-to-ground missile systems. This topic area is intended to bring together technology developers and customers of all types to share not only new technology developments and results from analysis, simulation, and testing, but also operational lessons learned. Papers may address testing, design, and or analyses of systems, subsystems, components, software, or algorithms.

  • Advanced Materials and Manufacturing: Sensors, Embedded Diagnostics, Additive Manufacturing
  • Insensitive Munitions for Propulsion and Warheads: Design Approaches, Modeling, and Test Results
  • Modeling, and Simulation: Integration, Targeting, Weapon Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned
  • Propulsion and GNC: Thrust Vectoring, Pulse Motors, Controllable Solids, Sensors, Algorithms
  • Test: Missile Integration, Targeting Capabilities, Weapon Effectiveness, and Lessons Learned
Weapon System Effectiveness – Operational Performance

Please direct questions to:      
Allison Cash, PeopleTec 
Timothy Wadhams, CUBRC

Assessing operational performance of weapon systems ensures mission success for the warfighter and cost effectiveness for the DoD. This topic area focuses on force level, mission level, and weapon system performance assessment.

  • Combat Modeling, Force Level, and Mission Level Assessment
  • Cost and Effectiveness Assessment
  • Cost of Weapon System Employment and Ops
  • Data Acquisition and Assessment
  • Direct and Indirect Fire Weapon System Performance
  • Measured Post-Intercept and/or Impact Debris
  • New Employment or Assessment of Weapon Systems
  • Probability of Hit & Kill
Weapon System Effectiveness – Performance Analysis, Modeling and Simulation

Please direct questions to:        
Allison Cash, PeopleTec 
Timothy Wadhams, CUBRC

Measurement, analysis, modeling and simulation of weapons system performance is critical to understanding the capabilities and limitations of our defensive systems across the battlespace. Performance includes accuracy, effectiveness and effects on sensors including lethality, debris, secondary damage and effects, and consequences. Briefings are solicited for a session highlighting new and innovative analysis techniques, high fidelity and fast-running models, component and system simulations, algorithms, and threat/target modeling techniques. Systems of interest span kinetic and directed energy weapons across the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Missile Defense Agency.

  • Computational M&S Test Predictions
  • Debris and Post-Intercept Sensor Scene Modeling and Simulation Predictions & Reconstruction
  • Distributed Architectures and Modeling Joint Operations
  • M&S Assessments on the Cost of Weapon System Test and Evaluation and Ops
  • M&S Criteria Development and Predictions
  • New and Innovative Modeling Techniques for First Principle Codes (FPCs)
  • New M&S Codes, Models and Techniques
  • New M&S Employed in the Assessment of Weapon Systems
  • Risk Reduction Through Weapon System M&S
  • Secondary Damage Modeling, Effects and Consequences, Including Casualty Modeling
  • Weapon System Effectiveness M&S of Lethality for Kinetic Energy Weapons
Weapon System Effectiveness – Test and Evaluation

Please direct questions to:  
Allison Cash, PeopleTec 
Timothy Wadhams, CUBRC

Testing and evaluation, from phenomenology to operational, provides confirmation of the effectiveness of our weapon systems and anchors our models and simulations. There have been many recent efforts to modernize testing infrastructures and develop low cost, high value techniques. This technical area invites participants in those efforts to highlight their achievements, results and plans by providing presentations highlighting recent test events and development efforts. Of particular interest are papers discussing new test venues, equipment, techniques, novel instrumentation and data collection methods for flight, ground, arena, gun, wind tunnel and anechoic chamber tests. Additionally, data management, utilization and performance criteria development and lessons learned are also of interest.

  • Assessments on the Cost of Weapon System Test and Evaluation 
  • Comparison of  Flight, Ground, and Computational Results 
  • Debris and Post-Intercept Sensor Scene Results and Comparisons 
  • Demonstrated Weapon System Effectiveness and Lethality for Kinetic Energy Weapons 
  • Evaluation of Results, Criteria Development, and Assessment 
  • Flight, Ground, and Computational Test Execution and Results 
  • New Diagnostics Employed in the Assessment of Weapon Systems 
  • New Venues and Testing Techniques 
  • Risk Reduction Through Weapon System Test and Evaluation 
  • Wind Tunnel, Anechoic Chamber, Directed Energy Ranges, and Other Test Types

Sponsors

Raytheon
Lockheed Martin